USC Title 8, Chapter 12: Immigration and Nationality

§ 1182. Inadmissible aliens

(a) Classes of aliens ineligible for visas or admission

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, aliens who are inadmissible under the following paragraphs are ineligible to receive visas and ineligible to be admitted to the United States:

(D) Immigrant membership in totalitarian party

(i) In general Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible. [CD’s Note – if we designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a totalitarian party or organization and/or sharia (ref: ROTT) a totalitarian ideology, that work toward or require, respectively, the overthrow of the US Constitution (man-made law) and its replacement with “divine” sharia perhaps we could secure the nation. All it takes is knowledge and will. (Emphasis added throughout.)]

(F) Association with terrorist organizations

Any alien who the Secretary of State, after consultation with the Attorney General, or the Attorney General, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines has been associated with a terrorist organization and intends while in the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in activities that could endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States is inadmissible. [Note – Executive Order 12947 (Clinton) lists terrorist organizations and has been/can be amended to expand the list.]

(G) Student visa abusers

An alien who obtains the status of a nonimmigrant under section 1101 (a)(15)(F)(i) of this title and who violates a term or condition of such status under section 1184 (l) [2] of this title is inadmissible until the alien has been outside the United States for a continuous period of 5 years after the date of the violation.

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate… [Note – if the 2011 islamophile in the WH could be persuaded, he could immediately address numerous threats with the stroke of a pen. The next occupant of the WH must swiftly act in America’s self-interest.]

See: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001182—-000-.html

Why have you forsaken me?

Shorn JFK Flag

Why have you forsaken me?

I am the Declaration of Independence.

I affirm liberty as the right and proper state of mankind.

Why have you forsaken me?

I am the United States Constitution.

I declare the people as sovereign and ensure representative governance.

Why have you forsaken me?

I am a Citizen.

I have been endowed by my Creator, by my very humanity with inalienable rights that no man nor government may confiscate nor hold hostage, that I may cultivate the greatest of human ingenuity, live with passion and have no boundaries save just law.

Why have you forsaken me?

I am the Idea that men are created equal and should be thus before the law.

I am the unrivaled ideal that individuals matter, that governments are formed among men to protect those individuals and defend to the greatest degree freedom of conscience and action for the few and the many.

Forsake me not…

O accumulated powers and sightless masses think not that there is no consequence to forsaking the good, the uplifting, the virtuous. For an unearned position held through artifice and devoid of honor can never for long be what you seek – a privileged life of iron rule apart from those betrayed and removed from justice. For most assuredly a bold new world will spring forth.

Any man is liable to err; only a fool persists in error.

~ Marcus Tullius Cicero

Friend or Foe?

Perhaps you can’t really know islam until it has breathed down your neck.

The Tiger is majestic and beautiful from a distance. If you could, the Tiger’s coat would be soft to the touch, its fang and talon hard and sharp. Its muscles ripple with strength as it ambles casually to and fro. Its voice is startling, yet proud and awe inspiring. And the Tiger lives in an exotic place of wonderment. The Tiger is truly magnificent.

Yet were you to perceive it from a different angle, to feel the Tiger’s hot breath upon you, to have nothing separating you from its raw power and natural instinct, would send you into a panic and instant survival mode. The Tiger’s presence would sharpen your thinking and govern your every move. Nothing would you take for granted, not your next heart beat, your next move, your surroundings, nor the mindset of the Tiger.

Is the Tiger friend or foe? Does it enrich your world or threaten it? From a distance it is a wonder, up close and personal it is life-threatening.

Be careful how you perceive things.

Islam’s 20 Year Plan

Over the coming weeks, I will comment on each point made in a piece by Anis Shorrosh “Author sees Islam’s 20-year plan for US” as published at World Net Daily in 2003. The author provides a list of tactics and commentary as his analysis of what he calls an “Islamic invasion” of America and asks ”Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?”

Here is the author’s list, shortened slightly for space, although I have added nothing:

“1. Terminate America’s freedom of speech by replacing it with statewide and nationwide hate-crime bills.

2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities who promote Islam as the religion of African-Americans while insisting Christianity is for whites only.

3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.

4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office to bring about favorable legislation toward Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.

5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the Internet as possible by buying the related corporations or a controlling stock.

6. Yield to the fear of the imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America – black gold. America’s economy depends on oil and 41 percent of it comes from the Middle East.

7. Yell ”foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran” anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.

8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions and get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way.

9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:
• Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961).
• Use no birth control whatsoever.
• Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them. Then divorce them and remarry every five years – since one can’t legally marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.
• Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants.

10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1,500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are currently 300 exclusively Muslim schools in the U.S. which teach loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution.

11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish ”Centers for Islamic studies” with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher-education institutions.

12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, when in truth, Islam hijacked the terrorists.

13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.

14. Nullify America’s sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans with reports of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls.

15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not America’s justice system.

16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S., but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.

17. Raise interest in Islam on America’s campuses by insisting freshman take at least one course on Islam.

18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by Internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media.

19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.

20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the U.S. by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.”

So, does Mr. Shorrosh make valid observations? Is what he stated or predicted come to pass? I will take the next few weeks to try to determine just what is the scorecard for this “Islamic invasion”?

The Obama List

Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. In Federalist No. 65, Alexander Hamilton described impeachable conduct as “those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.

Has there ever been a president so inadequately prepared – or vetted – for office, whose contempt for American history and Constitution is visceral, vocal and apparent; who promotes collectivist ideology so readily; who demonizes his political rivals and who glorifies the historically hostile doctrine of Islam? This “President” dismisses American Exceptionalism as readily as he does her Constitution.

“The Obama List” is a series of questions that could be (were they answered) used to review his fitness for office, to see if he has trod upon the public trust. These questions are based on some scrap (or mound) of available information and should be asked of Mr. Obama and pondered by Americans. Taken individually, the potential ramifications are disturbing, taken collectively one should ask if this man should be in a position of power in America.

  1. Was an original birth certificate issued to you and if so, where is it, and what does it say?
  2. Was Executive Order 13489 intended to conceal personal information relevant to your eligibility or citizenship, and/or our national security?
  3. How did you obtain your current Social Security number?
  4. Why are multiple Social Security numbers associated with your name?
  5. Did you receive any illegal foreign campaign funding or commit fraud in resolving same?
  6. What can citizens draw from your views that conflict with the US Constitution (spreading the wealth, collective salvation)?
  7. Did you orchestrate theft and violate contract law by taking a private company from shareholders and giving it to union(s)?
  8. Is it your intention to promote theft and/or coercion by forcing citizens to pay for their neighbor’s health care?
  9. Why did you have the Inspector General Walpin fired without just cause (Kevin Johnson case)?
  10. Have you signed any treaties without Congressional advice and consent, and if so, why?
  11. What was your intention in meddling in Supreme Court affairs re Saudi Arabia/9-11 case?
  12. Have you directly or indirectly intimidated the media and to what end?
  13. Are you informed by foreign law rather than adhering to the US Constitution in decision making?
  14. What was the purpose for your factually inaccurate and ill-advised apology tour in Egypt, Turkey?
  15. Why have you appointed Islamic apologists to positions of power (Koh)?
  16. Why have you appointed Muslims and Islamists to positions of influence in government, including DHS?
  17. Why have you appointed incompetent power mongers (Clinton, Napolitano) to positions of responsibility?
  18. Does tax evasion not register to you as a negative when deciding appointees (Geitner)?
  19. Are you attempting to by-pass Congressional oversight by appointing more than 30 Czars and Czarinas (Commissars?) without Congressional advice and consent?
  20. Are you bypassing the Congress or exceeding presidential powers by issuing scores of Executive Orders?
  21. Is appointing a race-emphasizing justice (Sotomayor) indicative of your supposed post-racial nature?
  22. Is appointing an unethical and potentially anti-American justice (Kagan) reflective of your values?
  23. Was government “transparency” enhanced by repeatedly truncating or eliminating time lines to review federal legislation?
  24. Do you consider 1,000; 2,000; or 3,000 page bills to be about moral governance or simply control?
  25. Was the content of the health care bill a result of collusion with select non-profits and/or unions?
  26. Was the manner of the health care bill passage a source of pride to you or shame?
  27. Do you think stating that you knew nothing about an incident, but that “the police acted stupidly” to be a stupid statement on your behalf?
  28. Was handing money to “Palestinians” essentially aiding terrorists or in violation EO 12947 regarding HAMAS?
  29. Has handing money to Pakistan resulting in funding terrorists?
  30. By playing soft on Iran are you allowing or accelerating the process whereby nuclear weapons will be in the hands of despots and/or Islamic terrorists?
  31. Do you think your kowtowing and bow-bow-bowing to foreign dictators and other heads of state has enhanced or detracted from our prestige and national security?
  32. Why did you dither so on actions relating to our efforts in Afghanistan?
  33. Can you define success for the soldier operating under your contemptible rules of engagement?
  34. Do you believe your fantasies about Islam (Justice? Good will? Contribution? Largest Islamic nation? Shared values?), or are you just pandering… are you complicit in social jihad?
  35. What is your aim in surrounding yourself with communists and leftists of every sort (Van Jones, Anita Dunn, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, others)?
  36. Have your connections to ACORN ever violated statutes related to bribery, conspiracy or kick-backs?
  37. What role have you played in the wholly inadequate response to Hasan jihad murders at Ft. Hood?
  38. Have you directly or indirectly interfered with the Congressional investigation of Ft. Hood Hasan terrorist murders, and if so, to what end?
  39. Can you possibly believe that trying terrorists in civil courts is superior to military courts?
  40. Do you think justice would be served to America if terrorists were judged by a “jury of their peers”?
  41. Do you think civilian trials for terrorists would provide a macabre platform for domestic and international terrorist propaganda?
  42. Are you attempting to extend Constitutional protections to enemy combatants (Miranda), and, if so, for what purpose?
  43. Were you involved in suppression of freedom of the press (Brenda Lee case)?
  44. Why are you thinking of creating (or even suggesting) a brown shirt-esque “civilian corps.”
  45. By your lack of interest in investigating CAIR and other HLF trail unindicted co-conspirators, are you indicating support for them?
  46. Are you willfully ignorant or are you practicing deception in your support of zakat (only goes to Muslims, supports jihad, is tax deductable?).
  47. Did you bear false witness or swear a false oath to the American people regarding your citizenship status, name or anything else?
  48. What is the objective in your constant criticism of and demanding concessions from Israel?
  49. By partnering with Egypt to support the OIC resolution on blasphemy are you indicating support for UN limits on free speech?
  50. Regarding Honduras, why did you side with the anti-Constitutionalist, Zaleya?
  51. Did you consider that using the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) for propaganda purposes to be acceptable or an illicit and nefarious act?
  52. Have you intentions, through Executive Orders, to yield American sovereignty (to Interpol)?
  53. By labeling US citizens “extremists” (for support of US Constitution, owning firearms, being Christian, having served in the US Military), did you mean to vilify them and prepare to take action against them?
  54. By what right did you presume to side with the UN in an investigation against the sovereign State of Arizona for human rights abuses?
  55. In whose interest is it to pressure the European Union to accept Turkey?
  56. Can you explain your lies (specifically the ones with video and/or audio documentation)?
  57. Can you justify the WHITEWASHING of national security documents and case files of any factual connections to Islam and jihad (i.e. deliberate deception)?
  58. Was your dismissal of the “Black Panther” voter intimidation case (AFTER it was won!) a sign of your brand of “justice” to come?
  59. Since you apparently campaigned for your pro-Islam relative Odinga in Kenya, can we expect you to support Islam eventually governing in America through sharia or other mechanism?
  60. Does your bumbling and utter failure to secure the nation’s borders have as its objective a non-secure America?
  61. Were your dealings with Tony Rezko lawful or dubious in nature?
  62. What is your objective in abandoning US allies (Israel in general; removing defense shield program from Poland)?
  63. By what right are you using the US Treasury as a selective purse-de jour (Pigford, banks, nations)?
  64. Did you exert political pressure with respect to seating or not seating persons elected or appointed?
  65. Did you mean to insult the Queen or the UK by returning the bust of Winston Churchill?
  66. Were the forced closings of auto dealerships partisan, and if so, how did you justify that?
  67. Do you find it disconcerting that your lack of economic acumen is obvious and your actions in this arena devastating to Americas of all income levels?
  68. Are your collective actions intended to weaken us militarily? economically? morally?
  69. Have you intentionally and knowingly acting against America’s interests?
  70. Are you seeking a post-American world?

The list could easily go on. No candidate or elected representative can be all things to all people. However, one should certainly expect a president that is by and large free of corruption, fraud and deception and that does not harbor disdain for the supreme law of the land or the nation itself.

Additional resources:
The Obama File
The Post American Presidency, Pamela Geller with Robert Spencer
Discover the Networks – President Obama
Obama Administration’s Scandals List

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff in Copenhagen

Ladies and Gentlemen,
I stand here before you in the city of Copenhagen in the year 2010. This is widely considered to be an enlightened country in the heart of an enlightened continent.

Our basic freedoms have long been guaranteed — first by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as passed by the United Nations in 1948, and then buttressed by the Council of Europe in 1950 through the European Convention of Human Rights, which was later affirmed by the European Union. Our individual countries have additionally codified the same basic rights in their own constitutions.

These rights include the freedom of individual conscience, the right to assemble peaceably, and the right to practice our religion freely, or to have no religion at all. And, perhaps most importantly of all, they include the right to voice our opinions freely and to publish them without hindrance.

Yet freedom of speech is under attack today here in Denmark, as it is in my own country Austria, and indeed all across Europe. Today, in 21st century Western Europe, our right to free speech is being shut down quietly and systematically with an effectiveness that the commissars in the old Soviet Union could only dream of.

A milestone in this ominous totalitarian trend will be reached tomorrow, 28 November 2010, when the member states of the European Union are required to implement an innocuous-sounding legal provision known as the “Framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia”, or, more fully, the “Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.” According to the final article of the Framework Decision, “Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 28 November 2010.”
Why does this matter to the cause of free speech in Europe?

If you read the full text of the Framework Decision (which may be found in the legislative section of the EU’s website), you will learn that “Each Member State shall take the measures necessary… to ensure that the following intentional conduct is punishable.” Such “intentional conduct” includes “conduct which is a pretext for directing acts against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin.”

Based on what has recently happened to Geert Wilders and me — and earlier to Gregorius Nekschot, Jussi Halla-aho, and numerous others — we can all guess who will be punished under this provision of the Framework Decision: those who criticize Islam.

Even worse, a complaint made by a member state does not have to be “dependent on a report or an accusation made by a victim of the conduct”, nor does the alleged offender have to be “physically present in its territory”.

In other words, if the dhimmi Austrian government objects to a cartoon published by Kurt Westergaard here in Denmark, Mr. Westergaard may be extradited by the Austrian Ministry of Justice to answer to hate speech charges in Austria. The European Arrest Warrant guarantees that the Danish government cannot legally interfere with such an extradition, and the 800-strong “European Gendarmerie Force” would be available to fetch Mr. Westergaard out of his bed and bring him to Vienna — with impunity.

As of tomorrow, the above scenario becomes a real possibility. It is not a paranoid fantasy. These legal provisions are detailed in the EU’s public documents, and they will enjoy the full force of law in all EU member states as of midnight tonight.

The death throes of free speech in Europe begin tomorrow morning.

As most of you already know, nearly a year ago I was made aware that “hate speech” charges might be filed against me — I had “denigrated religious teachings” by giving one of my public lectures on Islam.

The possibility of my prosecution was not communicated to me directly, but through articles in the press.

It was not until last month that a court date was set for my case. Once again, I had to discover this fact in the press — in NEWS, the same left-wing newspaper that brought the original complaint against me. I was not officially notified of my hearing date until several days later.

The evidence used against me this past week was a transcript of a tape of my lecture, provided to the court by the same socialist newspaper. It included words that were not spoken by me, and words that were not spoken in public, which therefore were not a violation of the law. But my case is not really about the law. It is a political trial, and like the trials of Geert Wilders and Jussi Halla-aho, it is intended to silence someone who speaks out against the barbaric nature of sharia law.

Above all else, it is intended to discourage anyone who might consider following in my footsteps. The oligarchs who rule Europe are determined to prevent any frank discussion among their citizens of Islam and its legal doctrines.

These are the methods of a totalitarian state.

They are more successful than those of the Nazis and the Fascists and the Communists because they are accomplished quietly and peacefully, with no need for concentration camps or gulags or mass graves or the shot in the back of the neck in the middle of the night.

They are surgical strikes executed via our legal systems, and they are quite effective. Between the summary punishment carried out against Theo Van Gogh and the Framework Decision applied though our courts, there is no room left for us to maneuver.

We are systematically being silenced.

I admire the provisions of the First Amendment that all Americans enjoy as their birthright. Its free speech provisions will make the imposition of sharia that much more difficult in the United States.

But here in Europe we are not so well-protected. Our constitutions and the rules imposed upon us by the EU allow certain exceptions to the right to speak freely, and those little rips in the fabric of our rights are enough to tear the entire structure to pieces.

We desperately need our own version of the First Amendment. We need leaders who are wise and courageous enough to compose and implement legal instruments that affirm the same fundamental rights that are guaranteed to all citizens by the United States Constitution.

We do not yet have any leaders of this caliber. But they are beginning to appear on the scene, and one day they will be the real leaders of our individual European nations, replacing the internationalist totalitarian usurpers who oppress us today.

Our nations will be governed by their own people, by those who truly represent them. Their leaders will be true patriots, people like Jimmie Åkesson and Kent Ekeroth in Sweden, or Oskar Freysinger in Switzerland, or Geert Wilders and Martin Bosma in the Netherlands, or Filip Dewinter and Frank Vanhecke in Flanders.

We are going to reclaim our continent and our nations. We will take our countries back from those thieves who sneaked them away from us while were lulled into somnolence by our wealth and our pleasant diversions.
This will not be an easy task. Our path will be strewn with obstacles and great dangers. But we must travel it nonetheless, because if we do not, European civilization — the heart of Western Civilization — will be destroyed.

What were formerly our nations will become regions with indistinct boundaries, populated mainly by people of foreign cultures and administered by corrupt totalitarian bureaucrats. The natives — the original inhabitants, our children, the descendants of those who created the greatest civilization the world has ever known — will be reduced to curators and costumed actors in a quaint theme park.

Call it “Euro World”. Authentic cuisine, ethnic dancers, and fireworks at ten o’clock.

This is what we will face if we give up our cherished freedoms. If lose our freedom of speech, then we are lost forever.

I am not a victim. I intend to stand up for what is right. I will defend what needs to be defended. Above everything else, I will exercise my God-given right to speak freely about what is happening. Freedom of speech is the single most important freedom we possess.

I am doing this for my daughter, and for her children, for those who will have to live in the world we are now preparing for them. I am doing what our grandparents should perhaps have done during the 1930s, when their own freedoms were under threat.

This is our time. This cup will not pass from us.

I am reminded of a passage in J.R.R. Tolkien’s famous trilogy, The Lord of the Rings. It is an exchange between Frodo the hobbit and Gandalf the wizard, and it concerns the perilous quest on which Frodo and his friends have been sent.

Frodo says:“I wish it need not have happened in my time.”
Gandalf responds: “So do I, and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.”

It is time for us to decide what to do with the time that is given us.

If I were to speak these same words tomorrow morning, I might be subject to arrest. I could be charged under the provisions of the Framework Decision, and extradited to the country that charged me using a European Arrest Warrant, escorted by the European Gendarmerie.

This is not an imaginary scenario; it is a very real possibility.

It is true that only a few people are likely to undergo such an ordeal. But it only takes a few people.

How many people have to endure what Mr. Wilders and I are enduring before everyone else gets the message?

How many examples have to be set before the rest of the European population understands the new rules, and is cowed into submission?

And we must remember to whom they will be submitting in the end. They will be submitting to our successors in Europe. They will be submitting to our replacements.

We must remember that the word for submission in Arabic is Islam.

When there are enough Muslims living in Europe — and it doesn’t have to be a majority of the population, just somewhere around fifteen or twenty percent — we will be living under Islamic law, and not the laws that presently govern us.

We will no longer enjoy what constitutional rights remain to us now. Our rights will be completely prescribed and delimited by sharia. Women will become the virtual chattel of men. Christians and Jews will be driven out or forced to convert to Islam. Atheists and homosexuals will be killed.

The European Union would consider these words to be “hate speech”. Under the Framework Decision, they would be classified as “racism and xenophobia”, and I could be prosecuted for saying them.

But they are in fact the simple truth.

Anyone can verify them by studying history. Anyone who chooses can read the Koran and the hadith and the Sunna of the Prophet.

Widely available official treatises on Islamic law confirm that my description is not “hate speech”, but a plain and accurate reading of the tenets of Islamic law.

It has become obvious that to tell the truth about Islam is now considered “incitement to religious hatred”.

It is now clear that non-Muslims who reveal the tenets of sharia law to the public are “denigrating religious teachings”.

If we meekly accept these rules, then we are acquiescing in the imposition of sharia law in our own nations. And I, for one, will not sit silently while this happens.

I don’t want my daughter to live under sharia.

Our time is short. If you and I do not envision an Islamic future for ourselves, then we must speak out now.

If we wish to preserve the right to speak and publish freely, then we must exercise it now.

I wish this need not have happened in my time. But it has.

We must make full use of the time that remains to us.

Thank you.

Original Post at:
Sabaditsch-Wolff in Copenhagen
Seneste opdatering: 28/11-10 kl. 1615

ELISABETH SABADITSCH-WOLFF´s tale from the Free Press Society conference at Christiansborg Saturday when Jimmie Åkesson also spoke. Among the many guests showed the German Freedom Party founder René Stadtkewitz and Rabbi Jon Haussmann, Toronto, Sam Solomon, Paul Weston, Arthur Legger, Danish and Swedish parliamentarians and several Norwegians.

By Their Law Shall We Know Them

The doctrine of Islam fully implemented under Sharia Law, consistent with the koran, sira and hadith, condemns freedom (speech, conscience, religion association, press, petition of government), forbids equality (between men and women, muslims and non-muslims) and denies traditional sovereignty (national boundaries, secular law, native culture). Any form of sharia, implicit (in mosques and ‘at home’) or explicit (as practiced in UK civil courts, as promoted by the Organization of the Islamic Conference to the United Nations), denies human rights to women, children and non-muslims. Therefore, allowing sharia in this Constitutional Republic or any non-islamic nation violates our basic laws of freedom, including freedom of choice. The tenets of islam as codified in sharia* are supremacist, discriminatory and misogynist; they invite or encourage deception toward non-muslims and mandate perpetual hostility to that which is not islamic. Sharia must be banned as being unConstitutional and its promotion labeled seditious, as it calls for the replacement of man-made law with “divine” sharia.

Whatever in islam that may be spiritual and promote the salvation of the soul is of little interest to me, unless and until it affects non-muslims, at which point it becomes political doctrine. And if this political doctrine calls for harm, subjugation, taxation, terrorizing and death, it is a free-people’s right and obligation to resist.

Speak about islam and sharia in this way. Challenge your listeners not to believe anything about islam that is not consistent with the foundational texts of islam and its body of law, for to do so is to be deceived and ignorant.

*Reliance of the Traveller: The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law here

 

Meet a Muslim: Jameela

An enlightening commentary by an orthodox Muslim “Jameela” as posted at Jihad Watch here:

Christians are Child Abusing, Demon Possessed, Devil-Worshipping, Cannibalized Vampires

What is the difference between a monkey, a Jew and a pig? There is no difference according to the Qur’an, which reveals Allah transformed some Jews into monkeys and swine and Genetic/DNA testing will confirm this. The Qur’an also reveals Christians will go to the Hell-fire for their worshipping Allah’s Messenger slave, whom they devour in their pagan rituals. I advise all Christians to read the Qur’an and discover what your evil, fire-species, greedy, Muslim-murdering, maniacal, monkey masters have kept concealed from you. Do not read the Koran, as the Koran is a crazy book, written by crazed Jew’s to hide their satanic origins; the Children of Satan aka the Children of Israel. Clinically insane Jews also wrote the Koran in an attempt to portray Muslims to be the murdering lunatics the world knows the Jews to be; yet Christians continue to serve and worship the war criminal, occupying, hostile fire species as Allah’s Chosen People. Christian’s arrogance is only exceeded by their brutal stupidity, as Muslims and Jews know the following Commandments invalidate Christianity; yet Christians continue to disobey Allah and perform uncivilized and depraved acts of cannibalism and vampirism on a dead Jew’s corpse and call it “religion”. Christians are being willfully ignorant, as they all know it was Allah and NOT Jesus who parted the Red Sea to allow the Jews to escape the pursuing Egyptians and the vampires also know that it was Allah and NOT Jesus who spoke to Moses on Mt. Sinai; yet the low-life, racist, cannibalized vampires continue to worship a murdered, Jew Messenger, “SLAVE” as their god.

1. You shall have no other gods before Me.
2. You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in the heaven above or that is in the earth beneath or that is in the water under the earth.

Out of sheer depravation and brute ignorance; Christians worship their murdered Jew god by eating his tortured and battered corpse like cannibals and they exceed all religious bounds by drinking his blood like vampires. Christianity was founded on violence as Christians have taken the murder weapon (cross) as their symbol of faith; as the cross is nothing more than an object from the crime scene. Additionally, the Christians god cannot return to earth unless Christians kill legions of innocent Muslims aka Armageddon. Christian’s penchant for violence is never-ending as they regularly use violence against their own children; as violence against their own children is called for in their forged “Holy” Bible (“…You spare the rod, you spoil the child…”), and the child-abusing cannibals have the audacity to call Islam a violent religion, while regularly using cult-sanctioned violence against their own defenseless children. Jew’s don’t ever beat their own children, yet they command their Christian slaves to use violence against their children. However, the most vile and evil act the depraved Christians perform in their pagan rituals is the invocation of Satan in his original form; “a smokeless flame of fire”. Christians invoke Satan every time they light a candle on the altar and the only purpose of a candle is to create “a smokeless flame of fire” that Satan is. Muslims and Jew’s know Satan was created from a “smokeless flame of fire”, as are the Jews. Christianity is permeated with violent sects of terrorist cells; such as the Aryan Brotherhood, a violent and racist sect and the radical KKK, whose sole purpose for existence is to inflict Christian terror into African-Americans and the hooded cowards use their symbol of faith; the cross, which they set blaze and leave behind as their ‘terrorist’ calling card; yet they are not the most evil sect of Christians.

Evangelicals are the most evil of sects within the cult of Christianity; in fact, Evangelicals are the evilest of “all” mankind. Evangelicals are not satisfied with merely eating the corpse and drinking the blood of their dead Jew god and invoking Satan in his original form. Evangelicals invite demons to possess their bodies so they can communicate (Speaking in Tongues) with Satan and they are so menacingly stupid; they actually believe demonic possession is acceptable because the demons (ghosts and spirits) are “Holy Spirits” and “Holy Ghosts”; but Christians also believe that Jesus lives through them by eating his corpse; however, they are too deluded and dumb to understand that what they eat, they defecate; reducing their Jew god to human waste. The most famous demon-possessed Evangelical is the treasonous, lying, winking, and racist, bible-belt witch and mother of a teenage tramp, Sarah Palin. Sarah and her equally racist and deluded, Tea Party followers want to take America back from Barack Obama; this foolishly “racist” platform is an indication of Sarah’s lack of knowledge of American politics; as everyone in the world knows that Barack Obama kneels at the Jew’s hooves and kisses their deformed butts just as Sarah does. If the treasonous witch wants to take America back, she will have to take it back from her maniacal, monkey masters; AIPAC, the hostile fire species who is presently controlling America. Sarah stated during her failed Presidential Campaign that; “America should not question Israel”. Sarah, if President, would be perfectly content to allow the homicidal high school dropout, Megan Deir, head of the bungling Mossad; continue to control America’s Military Industrial Complex and decide what wars America will continue to launch and lose. Additionally, Sarah is campaigning on an “American Values” platform. What is Sarah’s definition of “American Values”? It’s when your unmarried, teenage, tramp daughter keeps her b-astard child instead of aborting it. The only place Sarah will lead her racist followers is to the Hell-fire.

If the world’s leaders are stupid enough to continue to follow America’s AIPAC controlled “lead”; they should use all of their political capital and money to prevent Sarah Palin the lying Evangelical racist witch from becoming the next president of the USA.The world is aware the US Congress and US Senate can be purchased by the highest bidder, as America is a Jew-owned marketplace and everything is up for sale, including American politicians. Gary Peters, Ted Poe, Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid, are willing to sell their votes to the highest bidder; as these AIPAC, butt-wipes latest High Crimes and Misdemeanors was to sell out their own President and align themselves with the occupying war criminal, Benjamin Netanyahu, for the sole purpose of thwarting peace in the Middle East. I highly recommend ALL Middle East countries to use their petro dollars to purchase a couple of American politicians if you don’t want the Zionist-ruled Americans to invade your country under the guise of “War on Terror”.

Again, I urge Christians to read the Qur’an and avoid all things “Holy” i.e. “Holy Spirit”, “Holy Ghost” “Holy Communion” and the “Holy Bible”, as Christians will discover On the Day of Resurrection, the most insidious word known to mankind is the word “holy”; as this is the word their Jew masters used to preface the evil acts they commanded their Christian slaves to perform in the “Holy” Bible i.e. beating their children. The Jew’s forgery of the “Holy” Bible has reduce it to an instruction manual (How to Serve Your Hostile Jew Masters for Dummies) for those dumb enough to be a Christian. Christianity only benefits the Jews in the life of this world and it will be of no benefit to anyone in the Hereafter; but will be the justification for an eternity of torment and humiliation in Hell-fire for those who call themselves Christians. You Christians have two options; you can continue to follow your oppressive and greedy jinn masters aka Jews to the Hell-fire from which their father Israel aka Satan was created and will return; or you can follow Allah, the God of your father, Adam, to Paradise, from which he was created. Additionally, you Christians can improve your mental health and begin thinking rationally by getting off your mind-debilitating, steady Jew diet consisting of cursed Jew (pork-flesh infiltrated with worms), Jew-god corpse and Jew-god blood.

To those blood-thirsty, racist Christian cannibals who will murder Jesus after his Resurrection for the sole purpose of bleeding him out to bath in his blood; I advise you to reconsider your blasphemous and diabolical worship of a murdered Jew and read the Qur’an and discover your “real” purpose in life is NOT to worship and serve the Jew’s as you do. You will also learn the choice to become a Muslim is not a decision Allah left to the evil likes of Christians. Allah Chooses among His slaves those who are worthy by their good deeds to dwell in Paradise. It is an honor to be a Muslim and you evil Christians will learn this on the Day of Resurrection when you cannibals witness Muslims belonging to the exclusive club of Islam, enter one of seven Gates of Paradise; while Satan’s Offspring and their demon-possessed Christian slaves, disgraced and humiliated, enter one of the seven gates of the Hell-fire. Muslims are the “Chosen People”; chosen to dwell in luxurious Paradise as Allah’s “Honored Slaves”, for all eternity. On the Day of Resurrection, when Allah removes the covering from Christian’s eyes and they see their Jew masters true form; the Qur’an states: “their eyes will stare in horror and they will sink into a fainting from horror” On this fateful Day, Christians will only wish they had been Muslims in the life of this world, as they will learn; Islam is the only religion Allah will accept from His slaves to gain entry to Paradise. I know you dangerously dumb cannibals will laugh and mock me; but you will soon come to know, from the depths of the Hell-fire, ALL Christians will go.
Jameela

Jameela, Messenger of Allah | September 26, 2010 6:31 AM | Reply
The Lost Tribes of Satan aka Israel
The mystery of two of the ten Lost Tribes of Satan aka Israel has been solved. Allah reveals in the following Verse of the Qur’an that one tribe He Transformed into monkeys and they exist in the animal kingdom and zoos and the other tribe, Allah Transformed into swine; a major food source for the jew’s christian slaves.

(Say [O Muhammad to the people of the Scripture): “Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allah? Those [Jews] who incurred the Curse of Allah and His Wrath, and those of whom [some] He transformed into monkeys and swines, and those who worshipped Taghut [false deities]; such are worse in rank [on the Day of Resurrection in the Hell-fire], and far more astray from the Right Path [in the life of this world]”.)

Muslims obey Allah and will not eat a “cursed” jew {swine}, as we know the flesh of the swine is permeated with parasitic jew worms that control the minds of the jew’s christian slaves. Also, the pig has human qualities, as pig skin is used in pig-to-human skin graft transplants for burn victims. Allah identifies the jew’s to be the JINN in the following Verses of the Qur’an and He identifies the christian’s partially-eaten, jew corpse god to be a JINN slave Messenger, sent to the Children of Israel and NOT the Children of Adam {non-jews}.

(And they have invented a kinship between Him and the jinn, but the jinn know well that they have indeed to appear [before Him] [i.e. they will be called to account].)

(He [Isa-Jesus] was not more than a slave. We granted Our Favour to him, and We made him an example for the Children of Israel [i.e. his creation without a father].)

(Verily, those whom you call upon besides Allah are slaves like you. So call upon them and let them answer you if you are truthful.)

The jew’s forged the Torah and the New Testament to hide their Satanic origins and to identify Satan as a serpent, however, Allah reveals Satan aka Israel to be a JINN in the following Verses of the Quran:
(“And [remember] when We said to the angels: “Prostrate yourselves unto Adam.” So they prostrated themselves except Satan. He was one of the jinn; he disobeyed the Command of his Lord. Will you then take him [Iblees] and his offspring as protectors and helpers rather than Me while they are enemies to you? What an evil is the exchange for the Zaalimoon [polytheists, and wrongdoers, etc.].)

(And the jinn: He created from a smokeless flame of fire.)

The Torah and New Testament are forgeries, as they make gods of the jew’s, while making virtual slaves of the Children of Adam {non-jews}. It is time christian’s recognize the New Testament for what it is: an instruction manual; “How to Serve and Worship Your Hostile Jinn aka Jew Masters for Dummies”. Yes, Allah “Chose” the jew’s, He “Chose” the species consisting of monkeys, swine, devils and jinn; to return back to the Hell-fire from which they were created. The christian’s diabolical worship of a partially-eaten, jew corpse and their worshipping and serving clinically-insane, barn and zoo animals in the life of this world; mandates they receive the harshest punishment in the Hell-fire.

ALLAH is the greatest, ALLAH is ALIVE, but the christian’s god is only a partially eaten, jew corpse. ALLAHU AKBAR you rabid, jew-eating, racist, christian, cannibals of extremely low intelligence. I will be sure to tell your hostile jinn aka jew masters what loyal and obedient slaves you christians are. Enjoy your brief and evil life of fairy tales and hokum your evil jew masters have created for you, because the Hell-fire is your final destination. Only Allah’s Warriors can put-down the rabid, corpse-eating, blood-drinking, christian savages and send them to their partially-eaten, jew corpse they call god.

Jameela, Messenger of Allah | September 26, 2010 6:32 AM | Reply
Jesus’ Descent
Christian’s await Jesus’ return so they can take a diabolical blood bath in his blood to wash their evil sins away; however, Jesus will return, but it won’t be for the reason the jew-eating, jew-worshipping christian savages think. Allah reveals what Jesus will do when he descends to the earth in the following Verse of the Qur’an.

(“By Him [Allah] in Whose Hand my soul is, surely, the son of Mary [Isa {Jesus}] will shortly descend amongst you people [Muslims], and will judge mankind justly by the Law of the Qur’an {as a just ruler}, and will break the Cross and kill the pigs and abolish Jizyah [a tax taken from the people of the Scriptures [Jews and Christians], who are under the protection of a Muslim government. This Jizyah tax will not be accepted by Isa [Jesus] and all mankind will be required to embrace Islam with no other alternative.] Then there will be an abundance of money and nobody will accept charitable gifts.)

Jameela, Messenger of Allah | September 26, 2010 6:33 AM | Reply
Cannibalism is the Cult of Christianity
What kind of people would devour the already tortured corpse of their murdered god and drink his rancid blood? The Christians are the mentally deranged animals who regularly perform this pagan ritual and those deluded ass-wipes of the Jew’s have the audacity to call this satanic ritual a “religion”, superior to Islam. Christian’s clinically insane behavior does not end with them devouring their “dead Jew” god’s corpse. They delude themselves into believing that Jesus lives through them by eating him; but they have failed to realize or incapable of understanding they shit him out; thereby reducing their god to shit. Christians incredulously believe that a mere man who lacked the power to save his own ass from a mob of murderous Jew’s will save them from the certainty of the Hell-fire. Christian’s delusions are far reaching, as they believe they won’t have to pay for their sins because “Jesus died for the sins of mankind”. This too is one of many lies the Jew’s tell their Christian slaves. Master and slave, know damn well that Jesus didn’t simply lie down, fold his arms and announce “I am dying for the sins of mankind”. Jesus was chased down and overrun like a mad dog and brutally murdered on a cross by a perpetual mob of rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth, greedy, murderous Jew’s; a mob very similar to the mobs that have overrun Palestine and the US Congress.

The madness within the cannibalistic cult of Christianity has no bounds; as those criminally insane cannibals worship and revere the murder weapon that killed their Jew god. The cross is nothing more than an object from a crime scene, yet the Jew’s diabolically devoted Christian slaves have taken the murder weapon used to kill their god as their symbol of faith and they affix it atop their churches, they dangle miniature weapons (cross) from their necks and ears. One wonders what their symbol would be if the Jew’s had murdered Jesus with an AK47. Christianity is mired in cannibalism, bloodshed and violence.

Stupidity has no bounds within the cannibalistic cult of Christianity, as Christians really believe that a murdered Jew is the immortal God who created all things. Christians are incapable of understanding or they refuse to acknowledge the following two Commandments invalidate Christianity; yet the low-level devils continue to perform vile and inhumane acts of cannibalism on a dead Jew’s corpse and call it “religion”.

1. You shall have no other gods before Me.’
2. You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in the heaven above or that is in the earth beneath or that is in the water under the earth.’

The Christian cannibals thirst for violence and blood is never ending; as Muslims hope for Paradise after death and the blood-thirsty Christians hope to take a blood bath in their resurrected god’s blood to wash their sins away. However, the delusional cretins have not thought this out thoroughly; as they will have to kill Jesus all over again to shed his blood, to take their diabolical blood baths in. The most vile and evil act the Christian cannibals perform in their pagan rituals is the invocation of Satan in his purest form: “a smokeless flame of fire. Christians invoke Satan every time they light a candle on the altar. The only purpose of a candle is to create “a smokeless flame of fire”; Muslims and Jew’s both know that Satan was created from a “smokeless flame of fire”. Christians wait for Jesus’ return, but they never ask themselves who will raise Jesus from the dead? It will be Allah; the God of the Muslims will raise Jesus from the dead; as it was Allah Who created Jesus without a father.

I advise you blood-thirsty, corpse-eating, Christian cannibals who will murder Jesus after his Resurrection for the sole purpose of bleeding him out to bath in his blood; to reconsider your blasphemous and diabolical worship of a dead man and read the Qur’an and discover what your jinn aka Jew masters have kept hidden from you. You will discover that Israel is not a country, but Satan aka Iblis and the Jew’s patriarch. Don’t read the Koran, as this is a crazy book written by crazy Jews, in an attempt to portray Muslims as the murdering lunatics the world knows the Jews to be. On the Day of Resurrection, the cannibals known as Christians will only wish they had been Muslims in the life of this world, as they will learn on this Day that Islam is the only religion that Allah will accept from his slaves to gain entrance to Paradise.

I know that you will laugh and mock me, but you will soon come to know, in the bowels of the Hell-fire you will certainly go.
Jameela

Jameela, Messenger of Allah | September 26, 2010 7:35 AM | Reply
The Hell-fire will be brimming with dirty-white racist, corpse-eating, blood-drinking christian cannibals who would kill the messenger while ignoring the message. Enjoy your brief and evil lives of fairy tales and hokum your jinn aka jew masters created for their slaves; because the Hell-fire is your final destinations.

Immediately before the angel throws your evil asses in the Hell-fire he will ask of you: “Did no Warner come to you?”; and you will respond: “Yes a Warner did come, but my ignorance overcame me and I attempted to insult her and dismissed her as a crackpot, but if I had only listened or used my intelligence, I wouldn’t be a dweller of the Hell-fire.” And since you christians are accustomed to the mind-debilitating jew-diet of cursed jew {pork permeated with worms}, jew-god corpse and jew-god blood, this will be a noble treat for the evil likes of christians. I invite you ALL to kiss my black, MUSLIM-american, patriotic ASS if you can reach high enough you low-crawling, racist, corpse-eating, ASS-wipes of the jews you worship.

Islam is NOT a religion of peace, I repeat Islam is NOT a religion of peace; as violence is necessary to repel Satan’s Offspring aka Jew’s and their christian slaves attempt to force Muslims to worship the jinn aka jew god jesus by eating his corpse and drinking his blood under the pretense of religion.

Allah is the GREATEST, ALLah is ALIVE, but the christians god is a dead man. ALLAHU AKBAR you racist, dirty-white MUTHA FUCKAS of extremely low intelligence. Christians are the worst kind of slaves; slaves who don’t know they are slaves.

Newt Gets It – Ban Sharia

Here is Former Speaker of the US House of Representatives Newt Gingrich in a recent speech to the American Enterprise Institute entitled “America at Risk: Camus, National Security, and Afghanistan” addressing the threat of Islamic Sharia Law. The audacity of this consummate historian, this experienced politician, this leader-in-waiting, to speak aloud the truth of our enemy, the theo-political doctrine of islam and its playbook, sharia. Imagine if he were the next President of the United States. Imagine.

http://american.com/archive/2010/july/america-at-risk-camus-national-security-and-afghanistan

Update: Is a legislative reaffirmation of fidelity to the US Constitution and to State Constitutions and a rejection of the use of foreign law, including sharia law the realm of lunacy? Delusion? Wasted effort? Totally unnecessary? I have decided for myself, so should you.

We have the State Department legal advisor, Harold Koh, stating in correspondence that he “didn’t see any reason why sharia law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States.” We have a sitting Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan, who while at Harvard sponsored training in sharia-compliance finance, essentially supporting the entry of sharia into our capital markets, through the Harvard Law School’s Islamic Finance project. We have a New Jersey judge who found no crime in a muslim man raping his muslim soon to be ex-wife, since it was part of his cultural practice and found no criminal desire in the act. Fortunately, this opinion was reversed. We have mosques blaring their call to prayer over external loud speakers, actually or potentially violating local noise ordinances and irritating communities.

We have seen, or not seen depending upon your view, intimidation in the media and business and/or self-censorship in Mohammed cartoons, books about islam and letters to the editor, as well as modifications to working conditions. We have people under constant security or changing their identity and hiding from the world because US law and law enforcement are unable to protect the person from a muslim’s exercise of sharia law (threat of harm or death to “blasphemers” or apostates).

So, if you see there is not a problem, then by all means move along, nothing of importance here. However, if you see history as Newt Gingrich does, as I do, as the documentation in “The Legacy of Jihad – Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims” (Andrew Bostom, ed.) does, as Egyptian Coptic Christian, now American, Joseph Nassralla does, then it is time to inform your elected representatives that there is a very real danger in not addressing sharia now. Sharia condemns freedom, forbids equality and rejects national boundaries. Sharia promotion is seditious as it is essentially a call to insurrection, the replacement of our man-made Constitution with “divine” sharia. We should formally take a stand against sharia. Ignorance is not bliss.

Take the Pledge – Read the Koran

Take the Pledge
There is a brilliant new effort afoot to encourage people to simply READ the koran (quran). Please sign up to “Take the Pledge.”

And I further encourage and challenge you as citizens of the United States or any nation and any faith or no faith to read the koran by September 11, 2011.

The advance of Islam is global. The advance of Islam is a Political Action. The acts of war committed on September 11, 2001 did not just happen to the United States, they were a message to all people to bow to Islam or else. That day was one of many days during nearly 1400 years of intimidation, violence and terror perpetrated by the practitioners of Islam against others – in the name of Islam and in accordance with Islamic doctrine.

How will you know what that Islamic doctrine is? How will you know what to make of the news? You can read the koran. You can read an analysis of the “Islamic Trilogy” – the koran, sira and hadith (the biography and traditions of Mohammed, also known as the sunnah, “the way”). The “Take the Pledge” site has links to several on-line versions of the koran and places to purchase them. I suggest the Center for the Study of Political Islam here; look for primary doctrine books.

Islam’s prime goal is to impose itself and codify Islamic supremacy by implementing sharia law on all people. Sharia condemns freedom, forbids equality and rejects national boundaries. A nation cannot have sharia and LIBERTY. Citizens and their elected representatives must know enough to make intelligent decisions and KNOW it NOW.

Become Empowered – Before the 10th Anniversay

Read the Koran by September 11, 2011!

Islamic Apologetics at the Tennessean, Again

Mr. Lewis (at dlewis@tennessean.com),
From the one-sided treatment the Tennessean gave this story (“Islam is…”), I am concerned either you or the paper is falling into a trap of accepting the sweet deception of islam and failing to provide coverage of alternative views of islamic doctrine – fact-based evidence that contradicts the sanctioned lies and half-truths islam allows muslims to offer infidels to advance islam.

If so, you are a pawn in islam’s grand scheme to islamize the world, as laid out in islam’s foundational documents (quran, sira, hadiith) and islamic sharia law. Islamism is the strategy to spread islam globally, to institute islamic supremacy by implementing sharia over all people, muslim and non-muslim. The Muslim Brotherhood is the modern driving force behind the machine of islamic conquest. It supports numerous other organizations and people that do its bidding. The theo-political doctrine of islam:

1. Commands the attainment of political goals as religious duty (ref: quran, sira, hadith).

2. Is codified in sharia law – which demands the replacement of all man-made law (including our Constitution) with “divine” sharia.

3. Invites conversion, enforces subjugation or engages in war to achieve its objectives.

4. Allows for all manner of deception to advance its objectives.

So, islam is not solely a religion (1); its tenets invariably lead to sedition and insurrection (2, ref: Indonesia, Sudan, France, etc); it violates nearly every aspect of our Constitution, culture and traditions (3); and makes it impossible to distinguish “good” (orthodox, sharia-based) and “bad” (moderate or “mino”) practitioners (4). And islamism, like nazism or communism, seeks to overthrow what is for what it wants. And what it wants is wholly in conflict with the US Constitution and our culture. The freedom of religion argument is specious. This is about defending our form of governance and the freedoms it protects; it is about the future of America and her progeny.

The theo-political doctrine of islam must be expunged from every Western nation and held at bay with hot and cold war until it ceases to be a threat to our forms of governance, our cultures, our institutions and futures. You would do well to not aid the Muslim Brotherhood in its seditious activities by allowing yourself to be used as its mouthpiece.

In liberty,
C.D.

The Death of Liberty Begins with Submission TM

References:
Sharia for Non-Muslims by Bill Warner
Reliance of the Traveller: The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law by Ahmad Ibn Lulu Ibn Al-Naqib, et al.
Translations of the Quran, Sira, Hadith (life and traditions of Mohammed)
The Legacy of Jihad by Andrew Bostom
Why I am Not a Muslim by Ibn Warraq
The Sword of the Prophet by Serge Trifkovic
They Must Be Stopped by Brigitte Gabriel
Future Jihad by Walid Phares
Stealth Jihad by Robert Spencer
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Note: When Nashville resident Mr. Vijay Kumar attempted to respond to the “Islam is…” article with his own contribution, the Tennessean did not publish it. Mr. Kumar then posted the articles below on his own blog. The media and readers alike must be vigilant in identifying and dissecting propaganda, deceptions and partial truths as islam attempts to portray itself as something other than what is in its foundational documents. Mr. Kumar is to be commended for diligently pursuing truth.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Lena Khan is a source for the Muslim Brotherhood
by Vijay Kumar (August 2010)
When the Tennessean published Lena Khan’s warm and fuzzy “hug-a-Muslim” article on Monday called “Islam is a source of inspiration, learning,” they simply said about the author: “Lena Khan of Nashville is a writer and director for Ecmo Films.”

They didn’t mention that Ms. Khan had received funding from and worked for the Muslim American Society (MAS), the U.S. arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose goal is the “introduction of the Islamic Shari’ah as the basis controlling the affairs of state and society.” If you don’t know what that means, it means that they exist to overthrow the Constitution and the government of the United States and to replace it with a totalitarian Islamic theocracy.

In the infamous Holy Land Foundation case, one internal document spelled out the true strategy behind Ms. Khan’s benefactors using people like her to spread a benign and friendly message: “The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

As the Islamic authority Syed Abul A’ala Maududi put it: “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.”

Richard Clark, who was the National Security Council’s chief counter-terrorism advisor under both Clinton and Bush, has said that “the common link” between the most violent and active terrorist organizations, such as Hamas, al Queda, and Islamic Jihad, is Ms. Khan’s source of funding. “All of these organizations are descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brothers,” he said.

That’s quite a “source of inspiration”—and source of funding—for Ms. Khan to wax so gushingly over, while telling us how sweet and innocent she and other Muslims really, really are.

Of course, in the time-honored Islamic tradition of taqiyya (lying to infidels), MAS does everything it can to conceal its true origins and purposes, and to put on a happy face—like Ms. Khan’s. MAS was created when members of the Brotherhood, many of them supporters of Hamas, met at a Days Inn near the Alabama-Tennessee border during the early 1990s and agreed to call themselves the Muslim American Society. They further agreed “not to refer to themselves as the Brotherhood,” according to the Chicago Tribune, while keeping the same goals of overthrowing the American government.

One of the requirements of becoming an “active member” of Ms. Khan’s benefactor, MAS, is to study the works of one of the Brotherhood’s most revered authoritarians and martyrs, Syed Qutb. Some of Qutb’s quotes of note:

“All Westerners are the same: a rotten conscience, a false civilization. How I hate these Westerners, how I despise all of them without exception.”
“A Muslim has no nationality except his belief.”
“There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Shari’ah.”

Ah: now there is some of Ms. Khan’s inspirational “learning.” Qutb’s books are sold in the Muslim mosques that Ms. Khan assures us are “against extremism.” It warms the heart, doesn’t it?

Vijay Kumar
Permalink: kumarforcongress.net/2010/08/21/the-facts-the-tennessean-suppressed.aspx

Lena Khan Comes Back (Sort Of) For More
by Vijay Kumar (August 2010)
Lena Khan has posted a reply of sorts to my earlier blog article “Lena Khan is a source for the Muslim Brotherhood”—but she didn’t post it here on my blog. She posted to another blog that had reposted my article.

I’m not sure why she didn’t want to confront me directly, and only wanted to talk about me to someone else, but to be entirely fair to her, I’m going to post her response here, and reply to it, point-by-point. Her post is indented and in italics:

Everyone has the freedom for their views, but it is unfortunate that people just go off of information without checking it. Thus far, I have found dozens of supposed statements from Islam that Vijay Kumar has cited, which are not from Muslim sources and Muslims deem to be fabricated.

I’ve been hearing this same kind of dodge for decades. It elicits a yawn. Note that she admits that I have cited my statements, and though she claims to have found “dozens” that are somehow flawed, she doesn’t cite a single one. I don’t wonder why. [Continued here.]

http://kumarforcongress.net/2010/08/23/lena-khan-comes-back-sort-of-for-more.aspx

In Defense of Liberty

I comment here on the world as I understand it. This may be a “well, duh” statement, but I will elaborate on several concepts as I have come to know them in order to provide context to my comments. And for others who may view the world differently, perhaps this will clarify my opinions or facilitate discussion.

Why am I even here online? And under the moniker Civilus Defendus (ci VIL us de FEND us)? Why do I feel strongly that civil defense in America is important and that our constitutional form of governance is significant and worthy of protection? I keep coming back to human liberty, that I value it – cherish and honor it as our heritage, a deliberate gift from our ancestors – and wish to see its continued expression through the coming centuries.

Though I will be dust, my cultural DNA will live on in my progeny, my community and my nation and in people like me across the globe. I yearn to see human liberty advance, unabated, but a dark and foreboding mass, an ancient blood-stained ideology, desires that liberty be extinguished. I cannot yield my life without standing for human liberty, the freedom of conscience, expression and association that is so enjoyed around me and celebrated to its maximum extent, while not damaging the same for others. So, I offer these definitions which frame my views.

Islam is the theo-political doctrine as defined in the koran, sira and hadith as implemented under Islamic Sharia law. Islam commands the attainment of political goals as religious duty, offering an invitation to Islam, enforced subjugation under Sharia or war. A key tenet is to bring the entire world, Muslim and non-Muslim under Sharia law. The sira (life, or biography of Mohammed) and hadith (stories or traditions of Mohammed) are also referred to as the sunnah, the example of the “perfect” man, Mohammed. (Though his “perfection” I cannot see.)

Sharia is the “divine” law of Islam based on the koran, sira, hadith and deliberation of selected Islamic “scholars” or practitioners. (Though its “divinity” I cannot fathom.)

Islamization is the codification of Islamic supremacy by means of Sharia law.

Islamism is the strategy to Islamize the world; to impose Sharia and enforce Islamic supremacism. This strategy may include intellectual persuasion, intimidation, financial enticement, violence, terror, war, demographics, sweet lies or any combination thereof.

Implicit in this strategy and its endgame of Islamic supremacism is the oppression of all things non-Islamic; meaning the subjugation infidels, the denigration of infidel values, the insensitivity to infidel culture, the recurring theft of property and wealth – the fruits of infidel labor, the obliteration of infidel art and history, the suppression of science, technology and discovery, the taking of infidel girls as “tilth” for “plowing” and the loss of liberty, a thing relegated to our glorious past. A past of which we will all become ignorant as the decades pass and the demands of Sharia deconstruct the soul and conscience of men, of women, of children.

I come to this understanding from reading the texts involved, reviewing the history of times and places, and observing real-time events. If this resonates with you, feel free to share. If you rely on alternate definitions or understandings feel free to comment here. I seek ways to counter the billowing dark cloud in order to perpetuate that which is good in us.

The Theo-Political Doctrine of Islam

1. The theo-political doctrine of islam commands the attainment of political goals as religious duty (ref: quran, sira, hadith).

2. The theo-political doctrine of islam is codified in sharia law – which demands the replacement of all man-made law (including our Constitution) with “divine” sharia.

3. The theo-political doctrine of islam invites conversion, enforces subjugation or engages in war to achieve its objectives.

4. The theo-political doctrine of islam allows for all manner of deception to advance its objectives.

So, islam is not solely a religion (1); its tenets invariably lead to sedition and insurrection (2); it violates nearly every aspect of our Constitution, culture and traditions (3); and makes it impossible to distinguish “good” and “bad” practitioners (4).

Ergo, the theo-political doctrine of islam must be expunged from every Western nation and held at bay with hot and cold war until it ceases to be a threat to our forms of governance, our cultures, our institutions and futures. The risk and reward, the challenge and splendor of human liberty must trump submission.

Citizens’ Declaration of Threat & Plea for Relief

Hand delivered to the House Anti-Terrorism Caucus, June 29, 2010:

18 ACTIONS to STOP Sharia

We citizens of the United States of America, in order to preserve for posterity the foundation of liberty bestowed upon us by our founding fathers through our Constitution, do recognize the United States to be under grave threat of invasion, domestic violence and insurrection from elements within Islam. We respectfully declare the causes which lead to this belief and register our plea for relief. 

We Declare:

Islam is both theological and political in nature, as revealed in the Quran, Sira, Hadith and Islamic law known as Sharia, whose express ambition is to bring the world into a state of submission to “Allah” and “divine” Sharia law;

Core tenets of Islam/Sharia are irreconcilably in conflict with the United States Constitution, identified  in part as infringements upon freedom of religion and expression, lack of equality among    people and between the sexes, and sanctioned deception in dealing with non-Muslims; these precepts constitute a breach of inalienable human rights;

Political Islam’s supremacism represents a duality of existence, placing Muslims superior to non-Muslims, and endorses behaviors that can debase, harm or kill non-Muslims;

History is replete with examples of the aggressive and violent expansion of Islam across Africa into Europe and across the Middle East into Europe and Asia, offering an invitation to Islam, subjugation under Islam with inferior class status, or jihad war;

Current events are filled with examples of the Islamic expansion and imperialism through  armed and covert jihad, including Kosovo, India, Kashmir, Malaysia, Philippines, Sudan, Kenya, Israel, United Kingdom, France, Algeria, Morocco and others;

The attacks of September 11, 2001 upon the United States, its financial institutions, its people and traditions were claimed by people as jihad in defense of Islam, to spread Islam and to subjugate, obliterate, or otherwise defeat the United States;

Sharia finance has been shown to fund jihad against the United States and the West;

Many followers of Islam through words and deeds encourage insurrection and incite violence toward United States to subjugate it and replace the Constitution with Islamic rule; and

Many more silently endorse or use intimidation to support armed or covert jihad, therebyproviding aid and comfort to our avowed enemies during these times of domestic and international strife.

Now Therefore We the People  appeal to the President, Congress, and Supreme Court for relief from these dangers and to defend the people of the United States, our traditions and legal underpinnings from threats posed by political Islam, its leaders, its followers, or any other aligned force. We state that any nation so threatened from within or without has the responsibility, obligation and right to defend itself and its people from aggressors. This Declaration and Plea are deemed legitimate demands upon our government; Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution requires the United States to protect each state against threat of Invasion and domestic Violence. Continued accommodation, appeasement and hopeful assimilation   constitute surrender to the totalitarian ideology of Islam. The duty rests upon this generation to defend this nation for ourselves and posterity. We cannot allow liberty borne of more than    2,000 years of civil development to be vanquished.

Plea for Relief:

1. That political Islam and Sharia law officially be recognized by the federal government as threats to the United States, the Constitution, and American culture and institutions.

2. That Title 18 USC “Chapter 115: Treason, Sedition and Subversive Activities,” be fully utilized as duly appropriate against persons  for advancing Sharia law, advocating or  acting to implement jihad or other acts detrimental to security.

3. That Department of State programs, policies, training and relationships be evaluated for their compatibility with national security, and amended accordingly.

4. That foreign aid to Islamic nations cease and aid to nations influenced by Islam be severely curtailed, except to resist jihad.

5. That participation in the UN be reassessed based on human rights, security and relevancy.

6. That the courts and law enforcement be trained to recognize Sharia law, Muslim Brotherhood activities and the manifestations of jihad; and that jihad ‘crime’ statistics made available.

7. That immigration reforms immediately be implemented to include a suspension of immigration by Muslims for not less than 20 years, exclusive of genuine apostates seeking asylum.

8. That all prospective immigrants be characterized for their compatibility with the United States Constitution and be required to pledge an oath of allegiance, with violators deported.

9. That visa applicants be rejected for seditious history, or intent or association with jihad and that any foreign visitors exhibiting seditious behavior be arrested and/or deported.

10. That no Sharia-compliant finance be adopted for any government financing; that any private financial institutions must fully disclose any Sharia-compliant activities.

11. That our borders be secured by means of physical barriers, patrols and military actions as necessary to repulse illegal entrants.

12. That the legacy of jihad be subject to critical analysis in public and military education.

13. That no foreign influence or advocacy be tolerated in public school textbooks or materials.

14. That no foreign ownership be allowed of any media that purports to provide news services.

15. That no public monies or services shall be dispensed to encourage social separation in courts, schools, hospitals or other public or private places.

16. That any mosque violating its religious standing be reclassified as political in nature and subject to tax laws and if deemed appropriate other civil and criminal laws.

17. That any mosque found to engage in political organizing, allow or encourage incitement to violence, subversion or jihad be closed for not less than 2 years, and permanently for a  second such finding.

18. That no additional mosques be allowed until Islamic countries reciprocate in international  relations, freedom of religion and houses of worship, and social equality.

 Sharia condemns liberty and forbids equality.

Sharia can have no place in the Land of the Free.

Sharia: The Path to Ruin

It is through an understanding of Islamic Sharia Law that we must approach the current conflict and take every step to remove it from our lands. And to that end I will direct you to the always thought provoking and impeccably reasoned site of Bill Warner: www.PoliticalIslam.com and his latest offering on Islamic Sharia Law for a run down of what non-Muslims need to know about Sharia and its affect on Western nations.

If we non-Muslims cannot grasp the meaning of sharia we are defenseless before it. If we are ignorant, we may tolerate, or even embrace, that which will bring about the destruction of our Constitutionally based society and with it our human rights, our choice in governance – essentially all our liberty. Let us explore the essence of “the Sharia.” Here Osama bin Laden lectures the Saudis on the  proper interpretation of Islam (and its law, Sharia):

“There are only three choices in Islam: either willing submission; or payment of the jizya, thereby physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or the sword – for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” (The Al Qaeda Reader (page 19), Raymond Ibrahim, Ed/Translator, 2007.)

And more from “The Sword of the Prophet” by Serge Trifkovic  (2002). This I found a show-stopper. One page out of  thousands I have read made me put the book down until I further digested this one page. It offered a great insight into what we are facing and simultaneously revealed the greatest threat our civilization has ever faced.

Mr. Trifkovic quotes a translation of the Arab word “shirk” as “freedom” and then goes on to say that “…shirk, the ultimate, unpardonable sin of blasphemy and the exact opposite of Islam, stands for freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.” And that “Allah’s divine sovereignty is irreconcilable with popular sovereignty, which is the essence of democracy.” And finally, that “Islamic law, the Shari’a is therefore not a supplement to the “secular” legal code, it is the only such code and the only basis of obligation, because a Muslim’s only true allegiance is to Allah, and to Muhammad…”

Warner, Ibrahim, Trifkovic, Robert Spencer, Walid Phares, Wafa Sultan…many fine  authors of exceptional works can help lead us, in addition to our own individual investigations, to a sane evaluation of Islam/Sharia, one that inevitably concludes that Sharia is totally incompatible with our Republic and Constitution, and more broadly all non-Islamic societies. We cannot destroy Sharia, that is for Muslims to do, but we can impose a separation – to remove, disallow and prevent it; to criminalize its promotion (which I consider sedition) and cease immigration of people who promote Sharia. It is now for us to guide our elected representatives to act to protect the nation, to speak the words that will simultaneously invite cheers and condemnation – that Sharia cannot be tolerated and must be rooted out, expunged from our lands. Once informed, once contemplated…to not act would be (and is) an unconscionable failure and breach of trust and responsibility.

Resist Subjugation

RESIST Subjugation

 

The Death of Liberty Begins with Submission ™. 

It is not a choice between war and peace, but what kind of war. Shall we appease and accommodate and yield up the sovereignty? …Ending with a boot of oppression at our necks (or that pesky sword of islam)? Or shall we STAND for that sovereignty, for human liberty, to remain the last refuge on earth to respect it? Freedom isn’t free. 

And, this is not a 1st Amendment issue…It is about ideology. That it is a theo-political ideology is only marginally relevant. The aim of this ideology is to replace existing law, our existing sovereignty with sharia law, by covert or armed jihad. Therefore, the aim of this ideology is SEDITIOUS and anyone promoting sharia is a treasonous insurrectionist. 

We must have leadership with knowledge and strength to define the enemy – and speak its name, issue consequences for being the enemy and remind our citizens that the Western concepts of individual liberty and limited government as well as the US Constitution while not perfect are WITHOUT equal. 

“Our freedom in this country is the outcome of centuries. It is the consequence of a history that knows no equal and has brought us to where we are now.” Geert Wilders 

 When truth is censored and free speech extinguished, we become serfs to the powerful, dishonest and ruthless.

Re: Consideration of a Mosque in Your Community

Dear Sir,

I do not live in your community, but I have concerns about intolerance in America.

Islam is a total life-encompassing doctrine, addressing cultural and religious matters as well as political issues that is governed by Islamic sharia law, a law based on the koran, sira and hadith (the biography and traditions of Mohammed, or “sunnah”).

It must be recognized that the theo-political doctrine of Islam makes the attainment of political objectives a religious duty. The political objective is to bring the entire world under the “divine” law of sharia; to eradicate man-made law. And according to Islam, sharia is applied to both Muslims and non-Muslims.

The theo-political doctrine of Islam fully implemented under sharia law, consistent with the koran and sunnah, condemns freedom (of speech, religion, association, press, petition of government), forbids equality (between men and women, Muslims and non-Muslims) and denies traditional sovereignty (national boundaries based on language, culture and shared history). In sum, sharia violates our cultural values as well as our laws.

So, the thrust of my comment is that bringing a mosque into your community will inevitably bring sharia, including elements of sharia that are inconsistent and irreconcilably in conflict with the US Constitution and your state constitution, and will not simply be offensive to your community, but be destructive of it.

This message is not borne of bigotry, racism or hatred, only a concern that our great nation will continue to be a haven for human liberty.

An “Unacceptable Post” on Social Cohesion

In a recent blog post at The Shropshire Star Newspaper Online (UK) entitled “Sharia Councils ‘undermine social cohesion,’ ” Mark Pritchard, MP, remarked “By expanding the powers of Sharia Councils, ministers have set the scene for a breaking narrative which is fractious, discriminates against women, and, incrementally, is establishing a parallel legal system.” I’ll say. Mr. Pritchard goes on to say, “Sharia rulings are more likely to create legal ghettos – undermining rather than improving social cohesion. And in so doing, ministers are found guilty of piecemeal legal vandalism and managing the gradual decline of English jurisprudence.”

Astonishingly, we are told in the article that “Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, commented: “There is nothing whatever in English law that prevents people abiding by Sharia principles if they wish to, provided they do not come into conflict with English law”.” It is as if the weight of the legal argument falls entirely on the first concept – sharia is not prevented – yet no consideration is given to the second concept – whether sharia does or does not conflict with English law.  And Mr. Pritchard further observes, “Such conflicts occur throughout Britain every week, and with it, the shunning of basic rights for thousands of British Muslim women.”

MP Pritchard is a member of the Conservative Party Human Rights Commission and is concerned that sharia violates human rights. So am I. In fact, it is one of my core challenges to sharia in any non-islamic nation – sharia violates all or nearly all national constitutions and charters in some manner or the other. (I am leaving aside the question of whether sharia promotion is sedition.) So, I thought I would participate in the dialog, international dialog at that, and post a comment. I did and while it sat, well I sat,  awaiting moderation, I read the ‘content standards.’  They include that contributions must not (emphasis mine):

  • Contain any material which is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory
  • Be threatening, abuse or invade another’s privacy, or cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety.
  • Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person.

With standards like this, it is a wonder anything of importance is discussed publicly.  So, I am not holding my breath to see if my comment shows up. There was, of course, a note by someone calling the blog entry a “right wing xenophobic” comment and questioning Mr. Prichard’s honor. I am posting my comment here in its brief, yet potentially unacceptable, entirety.

The theo-political ideology of Islam fully implemented under sharia law – consistent with the koran, sira and hadith – condemns freedom (speech, religion association, press, petition of government), forbids equality (between men and women, muslims and non-muslims) and denies traditional sovereignty (national boundaries based on language, culture and shared history). Any form of sharia, implicit (in mosques and ‘at home’) or explicit (as practiced in civil or criminal courts), denies human rights to women and children. Therefore, allowing sharia in a Constitutional Republic or any non-islamic nation violates that nation’s basic laws. The tenets of islam are supremacist and misogynist; they invite or encourage deception toward non-muslims and mandate perpetual hostility to that which is not islamic. Study up before you shout about xenophobia or whatever…

Wilders, Liberty & Totalitarianism

Dear FOX News,

glennbeck@foxnews.com; Fncspecials@foxnews.com; FNS@foxnews.com; letters@charleskrauthammer.com  (3-10-2010)

While I appreciate your discussing Islam, I respectfully submit that unless you have studied the theo-political doctrine of Islam – the Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed) and Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed), and its “divine” Sharia law you are very much out of your element in discussing Islam or Muslim behavior. Someone on your staff must immerse themselves in a study of the tenets of Islam, as totalitarian Islam embodies the greatest global and domestic threat to liberty, equality and peace.

Islam’s express desire is to bring the world, Muslim and non-Muslim, under sharia law. If Islam is weak for a period of time, the Islamic community will appear peaceful; however as it gains in numbers and strength the Islamic community will attempt to impose sharia. For examples see Islamic demands and actions in the United Kingdom, France, Kenya or Indonesia. Immigration is the first step in this slow conquest, followed by demands and intimidation, then intolerance, discrimination and violence.

A Muslim who strives in defense or support of Islam may engage, indeed is required to engage in or fund, armed or covert jihad. Islam offers infidels three options, first conversion – an invitation to Islam (Osama bin Laden did this in a letter to former President Bush), then subjugation under sharia (as the Copts are in Egypt today), or jihad war until you convert, accept subjugation or die (reference Sudan, etc).

When a man risks his life and that of his family to speak the truth, when a man stands for principles, for the centuries and souls it took to create systems of governance where liberty is allowed and personal freedom largely protected – you, an AMERICAN media news and opinion outlet should not decry that person for doing so. Perhaps you should pull up a chair and learn something, rather than be in line to squelch the life out of that canary…he is warning you, too, if you would only listen.

Sharia law condemns freedom, forbids equality, and denies traditional sovereignty; it is legitimate that we reject it. The call to sharia law in America is a call to overthrow the US Constitution. Jihad, whether state organized or by individuals must be recognized for what it is, the followers of Islam engaging in war to advance Islam and force the imposition of Islamic sharia law. Please educate yourselves; you may choose cultural suicide, I do not.

To liberty under the US Constitution,

CD, US Citizen

References: Koran, Sira, Hadith

A Matter of Ideology

The conflict between representative governance and Islam is not about freedom of speech or religion. It is about ideology. Islam is an ideology totally intolerant of non-adherents and both restrictive and discriminatory of its own believers.  This post is an evolution of a my previous thoughts on this subject.

I shall define “ideology” as a set of beliefs or precepts that form the basis of a thought process or political system, particularly one that is resistant to outside influence and nearly incapable of self-modification to adapt to changing circumstances.

I further define principled constitutional governance as a collection of ideas and standards that form a political system, informed by history and intended to meet the needs of the governed. This does not a hedonistic haven create, but rather establishes a framework for its citizenry to pursue their goals with the maximum liberty and minimal obstruction to the affairs of others. While this may also be termed an ideology, this system is contemplative and both aware of its surroundings and responsive to circumstances within its established framework.

Islam is an ideology that makes the attainment of Political Objectives a Religious Duty. The objective is to see the entire world under the “divine” (religious) law of sharia; to obliterate man-made law. So, Islam is both theological and political, a theo-political ideology – a rigid, totalitarian, intolerant, supremacist ideology. All this is found in the koran and sunnah, detailed in the body of Islamic sharia law and implemented in nations practicing Islamic jurisprudence.

We free nations can call Islam an ideology and we can talk about an ideology freely. However one cannot talk about implementing this ideology, about replacing our Constitutional government – for crossing that line is sedition. So, we can analyze Islam and sharia law, read about it and study its consequences in Islamic lands, its effects on Western “host” nations, however the second anyone talks about implementing sharia they are committing act of sedition against the sovereign nation they are in. Religion? Practice whatever you want as long as you leave ME, the Infidel out of it and keep your hands OFF my Constitution. Speech? Speak freely, but do not incite violence, genocide or insurrection.

Continued ignorance, accommodation, appeasement and ‘hopeful assimilation’ is aiding and abetting cultural suicide.