Islamic Apologetics at the Tennessean, Again

Mr. Lewis (at,
From the one-sided treatment the Tennessean gave this story (“Islam is…”), I am concerned either you or the paper is falling into a trap of accepting the sweet deception of islam and failing to provide coverage of alternative views of islamic doctrine – fact-based evidence that contradicts the sanctioned lies and half-truths islam allows muslims to offer infidels to advance islam.

If so, you are a pawn in islam’s grand scheme to islamize the world, as laid out in islam’s foundational documents (quran, sira, hadiith) and islamic sharia law. Islamism is the strategy to spread islam globally, to institute islamic supremacy by implementing sharia over all people, muslim and non-muslim. The Muslim Brotherhood is the modern driving force behind the machine of islamic conquest. It supports numerous other organizations and people that do its bidding. The theo-political doctrine of islam:

1. Commands the attainment of political goals as religious duty (ref: quran, sira, hadith).

2. Is codified in sharia law – which demands the replacement of all man-made law (including our Constitution) with “divine” sharia.

3. Invites conversion, enforces subjugation or engages in war to achieve its objectives.

4. Allows for all manner of deception to advance its objectives.

So, islam is not solely a religion (1); its tenets invariably lead to sedition and insurrection (2, ref: Indonesia, Sudan, France, etc); it violates nearly every aspect of our Constitution, culture and traditions (3); and makes it impossible to distinguish “good” (orthodox, sharia-based) and “bad” (moderate or “mino”) practitioners (4). And islamism, like nazism or communism, seeks to overthrow what is for what it wants. And what it wants is wholly in conflict with the US Constitution and our culture. The freedom of religion argument is specious. This is about defending our form of governance and the freedoms it protects; it is about the future of America and her progeny.

The theo-political doctrine of islam must be expunged from every Western nation and held at bay with hot and cold war until it ceases to be a threat to our forms of governance, our cultures, our institutions and futures. You would do well to not aid the Muslim Brotherhood in its seditious activities by allowing yourself to be used as its mouthpiece.

In liberty,

The Death of Liberty Begins with Submission TM

Sharia for Non-Muslims by Bill Warner
Reliance of the Traveller: The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law by Ahmad Ibn Lulu Ibn Al-Naqib, et al.
Translations of the Quran, Sira, Hadith (life and traditions of Mohammed)
The Legacy of Jihad by Andrew Bostom
Why I am Not a Muslim by Ibn Warraq
The Sword of the Prophet by Serge Trifkovic
They Must Be Stopped by Brigitte Gabriel
Future Jihad by Walid Phares
Stealth Jihad by Robert Spencer
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Note: When Nashville resident Mr. Vijay Kumar attempted to respond to the “Islam is…” article with his own contribution, the Tennessean did not publish it. Mr. Kumar then posted the articles below on his own blog. The media and readers alike must be vigilant in identifying and dissecting propaganda, deceptions and partial truths as islam attempts to portray itself as something other than what is in its foundational documents. Mr. Kumar is to be commended for diligently pursuing truth.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Lena Khan is a source for the Muslim Brotherhood
by Vijay Kumar (August 2010)
When the Tennessean published Lena Khan’s warm and fuzzy “hug-a-Muslim” article on Monday called “Islam is a source of inspiration, learning,” they simply said about the author: “Lena Khan of Nashville is a writer and director for Ecmo Films.”

They didn’t mention that Ms. Khan had received funding from and worked for the Muslim American Society (MAS), the U.S. arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose goal is the “introduction of the Islamic Shari’ah as the basis controlling the affairs of state and society.” If you don’t know what that means, it means that they exist to overthrow the Constitution and the government of the United States and to replace it with a totalitarian Islamic theocracy.

In the infamous Holy Land Foundation case, one internal document spelled out the true strategy behind Ms. Khan’s benefactors using people like her to spread a benign and friendly message: “The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

As the Islamic authority Syed Abul A’ala Maududi put it: “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.”

Richard Clark, who was the National Security Council’s chief counter-terrorism advisor under both Clinton and Bush, has said that “the common link” between the most violent and active terrorist organizations, such as Hamas, al Queda, and Islamic Jihad, is Ms. Khan’s source of funding. “All of these organizations are descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brothers,” he said.

That’s quite a “source of inspiration”—and source of funding—for Ms. Khan to wax so gushingly over, while telling us how sweet and innocent she and other Muslims really, really are.

Of course, in the time-honored Islamic tradition of taqiyya (lying to infidels), MAS does everything it can to conceal its true origins and purposes, and to put on a happy face—like Ms. Khan’s. MAS was created when members of the Brotherhood, many of them supporters of Hamas, met at a Days Inn near the Alabama-Tennessee border during the early 1990s and agreed to call themselves the Muslim American Society. They further agreed “not to refer to themselves as the Brotherhood,” according to the Chicago Tribune, while keeping the same goals of overthrowing the American government.

One of the requirements of becoming an “active member” of Ms. Khan’s benefactor, MAS, is to study the works of one of the Brotherhood’s most revered authoritarians and martyrs, Syed Qutb. Some of Qutb’s quotes of note:

“All Westerners are the same: a rotten conscience, a false civilization. How I hate these Westerners, how I despise all of them without exception.”
“A Muslim has no nationality except his belief.”
“There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Shari’ah.”

Ah: now there is some of Ms. Khan’s inspirational “learning.” Qutb’s books are sold in the Muslim mosques that Ms. Khan assures us are “against extremism.” It warms the heart, doesn’t it?

Vijay Kumar

Lena Khan Comes Back (Sort Of) For More
by Vijay Kumar (August 2010)
Lena Khan has posted a reply of sorts to my earlier blog article “Lena Khan is a source for the Muslim Brotherhood”—but she didn’t post it here on my blog. She posted to another blog that had reposted my article.

I’m not sure why she didn’t want to confront me directly, and only wanted to talk about me to someone else, but to be entirely fair to her, I’m going to post her response here, and reply to it, point-by-point. Her post is indented and in italics:

Everyone has the freedom for their views, but it is unfortunate that people just go off of information without checking it. Thus far, I have found dozens of supposed statements from Islam that Vijay Kumar has cited, which are not from Muslim sources and Muslims deem to be fabricated.

I’ve been hearing this same kind of dodge for decades. It elicits a yawn. Note that she admits that I have cited my statements, and though she claims to have found “dozens” that are somehow flawed, she doesn’t cite a single one. I don’t wonder why. [Continued here.]

2 thoughts on “Islamic Apologetics at the Tennessean, Again

Add yours

  1. The entire premise for the article Vijay Kumar has written is completely false. Lena Khan never received any funding nor worked for the Muslim American Society. It is simply a lie.

    It is extremely irresponsible for a supposed congressional candidate to use misinformation. He should be ashamed of himself. It is clear that his views are motivated by hate instead of fact.

  2. How do you explain away 1400 years of islamic violence,death, persecution of non-muslims and women?
    I have found Mr. Kumar to quite accurate and he is far from one who is motivated by hate. It is completely irresponsible for islam to use taqiyya
    and be constantly committing acts of horror and
    terrorism(see religion of peace website)on a daily basis. islam tries to have it both ways and you
    can’t, Ahmad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: